- Extract the json reading from the json merging: it makes the code hard to understand.
This helps for the separation of concerns: the jsons are read in one method;
and merged in a second one
- Added a first test to check the merge function
No change in behaviour was done, this change is just there to increase code coverage
and to prepare for #9315
- When testing `brew unbottled <formula>` this crashed because I, as a
maintainer, have `HOMEBREW_NO_ANALYTICS` set on all my machines to
avoid polluting the analytics with test installs.
```
❯ brew unbottled
==> Getting formulae...
==> Getting analytics data...
Error: undefined method `[]' for nil:NilClass
/usr/local/Homebrew/Library/Homebrew/dev-cmd/unbottled.rb:89:in `formulae_all_sort_installs_from_args'
/usr/local/Homebrew/Library/Homebrew/dev-cmd/unbottled.rb:49:in `unbottled'
/usr/local/Homebrew/Library/Homebrew/brew.rb:119:in `<main>'
```
The first attempt to build and pull a formula (hello) for linux in homebrew-core
resulted in a wrong cellar line being added to the formula's bottle block.
How to test/debug this, using the 4 bottles that where built for hello:
brew bottle --merge --debug hello--2.10_1.mojave.bottle.json hello--2.10_1.x86_64_linux.bottle.json hello--2.10_1.big_sur.bottle.json hello--2.10_1.catalina.bottle.json
This command would add create the following bottle block:
bottle do
cellar "/home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/Cellar"
sha256 "a0af7dcbb5c83f6f3f7ecd507c2d352c1a018f894d51ad241ce8492fa598010f" => :big_sur
sha256 "5334dd344986e46b2aa4f0471cac7b0914bd7de7cb890a34415771788d03f2ac" => :catalina
sha256 "22948764d8f8d7be4870ff92dae64d986eb63a9150b219c20fff87d1a6aa93d6" => :mojave
sha256 "702dc7f78444d2f4f1c19324be654bcbb8b99dd0e9ce26c3e2fbc3b6464a189f" => :x86_64_linux
end
After the change in this PR, the result is the following:
bottle do
sha256 "a0af7dcbb5c83f6f3f7ecd507c2d352c1a018f894d51ad241ce8492fa598010f" => :big_sur
sha256 "5334dd344986e46b2aa4f0471cac7b0914bd7de7cb890a34415771788d03f2ac" => :catalina
sha256 "22948764d8f8d7be4870ff92dae64d986eb63a9150b219c20fff87d1a6aa93d6" => :mojave
sha256 "702dc7f78444d2f4f1c19324be654bcbb8b99dd0e9ce26c3e2fbc3b6464a189f" => :x86_64_linux
end
The brew bottle --merge code will pick the most common cellar line between the 4 bottles, by order of priority:
- non-relocatable (fixed cellar path)
- cellar :any
- cellar :any_skip_relocation
In the case of the hello bottle, the 3 mac bottles are "cellar :any_skip_relocation", and the linux bottle
is non-relocatable. So the linux bottle wins and the code correctly determines that the 4 bottles should
be non-relocatable.
In that case, the /home/linuxbrew/.linuxbrew/Cellar path is defined as cellar, and by convention
we do not write that out to the formula file, hence the cellar path check that needs to be modified
in this PR.
This PR also fixes the same situation for mac ARM cellar paths
workflow_run is an array, which first element is the json
returned by the github API. We need to check that first element
if we want to know if the workflow exists.
and allow to skip missing workflows
Can be used like this:
brew pr-pull --workflows=tests.yml,wheezy_tests.yml --ignore-missing-artifacts=wheezy_tests.yml PRNUMBER
- When running `brew audit` on formulae that aren't in a Homebrew tap
location (ie, in a directory outside of
`/usr/local/Homebrew/Library/Taps`), `brew audit` falls over because
it can't determine which tap a formula is in.
Markus Reiter